![]() ![]() They are usually the ones that break the most often as 1 developers idea of what looks right or the correct flow might not be what another developer thinks is right. Personally I wouldn't leave it down to just one type of testing, acceptance tests can be flaky. I guess another option would be to leave coverage of them up to feature tests, It's sometimes referred to as subcutaneous testing, you can do some more reading on the topic here The aim here is to test everything in your application up until your UI layer which from your original text the OPs original text I think is what you're currently doing. Yeah, this is fine, just make it consistent across your team. I assume an integration directory is where I should move tests concerning my eloquent models? A relatively newcomer to the game is cypress, I've used it in a recent project and was impressed by its ease of use, especially compared to selenium. Laravel has one built-in called dusk, although the industry standard is Selenium. This is moving more into the integration/acceptance testing area rather than unit testing.Īlthough PHPUnit can do some level of integration testing and it can do acceptance testing to a certain degree but it certainly isn't as robust as a dedicated solution. If your unit test is hitting the database it's very likely your unit test isn't testing a single unit of code.įrom what I can gather from your post, although it's not fully clear, you're trying to test multiple blocks of code in a single test. If your single piece of code does need some kind of object to work with then you need to look into mocking that object to run your tests against that. Eloquent is extremely well tested and doesn't need any more unit tests. Whether you choose to to this data seeding with a seeder or "manually" in the test, up to you, opinions on this vary greatly.Īs mentioned in another post on this thread, your unit tests shouldn't be hitting a database for any reason. This way the test clearly shows what is being inserted, instead of you (or someone else) having to guess at a later point. To make things more speedy, ensure you're using sqlite in your tests # phpunit.xmlīe aware though SQLite does not have the same feature set as MySQL so if your migrations are doing something special (like if your application is using a spatial column type like POINT) you'll have to switch your test suite to use MySQL as well.Īs for seeding your database, I'd argue you should seed your database with the required data for a given test right there in the test. If they don't supply a suffix, we'll go for the highest weighted Accept header we can support.Luckily, the RefreshDatabase trait handles this for you We will give the highest weight to the file suffix on the end of the URI - if a client requests /foo.json, we'll assume they want JSON, even if the Accept header only specifies application/xml. Its job in my imaginary API is to read the request path and headers and decide a) whether the client has requested a valid format at all and b) what is the highest priority supported format they have asked for. Imagine a service to testįor the sake of argument, I've written a simple content negotiator class for an API which can return data in multiple formats. This is the contention I want to explore in today's blog post. My contention, however, is that these cases are a rare exception, that - particularly in the PHP community but also more broadly - mocks are vastly overused and over-relied on, have a tendency to lead to badly constructed, uninformative, brittle tests and are simply neither needed nor preferable in the majority of cases. ![]() ![]() Sometimes we have complex business logic interacting with dependencies in such a way that it's difficult in practice to test without making direct assertions about how the dependency was used. This is, on occasion, a legitimately useful thing to do. In PHP, they are instantly recognizable by code which looks like this: $mockFoo->expects($this->once())->method('bar')->with($this->equalTo('baz')) Mocks are a type of test double which make assertions on how the object will be used what methods will be called, what order, how many times, with what parameters. If you've written a unit test, you've (almost definitely) written mocks. If you've ever seen a unit test, you've seen mocks. Better PHP unit testing: avoiding mocksīetter PHP unit testing: avoiding mocks What are mocks?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |